On Identity While Listening to Folk Music:
Read at the Burnt Toast in Boulder, Colorado on January 30, 2008
The black suffering in this country was defined by the color of skin, the construction of race created by the hands of white aristocrats. Today is their suffering still defined as so? In many ways yes, because white America is still in debt to them, they still haven't paid the price and perhaps never will, America is still racist, there is still discrimination and there is segregation of communities- black, white, hispanic, indian, native american, chinese, etc. In Modernism people defined themselves as the New Negro, the New Woman, the New Artist, the New dramatist, but now there are so many subdivisions that this type of definition is irrelevant. These identities needed to be found out of Victorianism, they needed to be defined, because they were simply being ignored. Now they need to be redefined again, because there are babies who are African, Irish, Philippine, and Japanese. Where is there genre? What is there culture? What is there music? Where are they defined in society?
How do we identify ourselves? How do the privileged define their suffering, those whose grandparents weren't discriminated against in this meaningless construct of race? For me an Anglo-Saxon- but just defining that, what does that even mean- it doesn't have meaning for me like an African American who is proud they survived racial discrimination, in touch with the history of suffering their family was engulfed, or a Jew whose grandparents survived the greatest genocide in history, or a Mexican who jumped the fence into this country to make a better life. What is my culture? What is my suffering?
Is it that I'm a woman and have many times felt the effects of that? Is it that my mother's family were coal miners, drenched in sweat and fumes to buy food at the mining store in which they received rations? Is it that my great grandmother was half Cherokee, an illegitimate child, born to be hidden? Is it that I grew up hating myself for the way I always wanted to be a boy? Is it that I've been fed a religion in which I've never believed, but am forced to hide this from the people I love? Is it that my sister had a baby that she won't ever talk about? Is it that I might kill myself if I stop taking a medication that others regularly abuse, and I may be abusing as well? Is it that I'm white and christian and privileged and I hate that? Yeah.
This is my identity, because these are my experiences, these are my sufferings, this is my history, my culture. I've always wanted another one- I've always wanted the sufferings of an American indian or a black or a latino, because I want the pride that comes with it, the history, the culture. I've realized that the human experience is unique to each individual person. A black man from London, that grew up there, ancestors live there- wouldn't have the same pride as a black man from New Orleans, but he should have equal pride because he is unique and his sufferings are unique to his family and to him.
This is post-modernism. Destroying the constructs of race, gender, height, weight, while keeping culture alive in the hearts of millions whose experiences radically differ. This is post-modernism. Redefining the human experience.
Modernism broke free from Victorianism- the complete control of white males over wealth, class, and power. Post-Moderism will break free again, this time from the movements defined in Modernism- the New Women, the New Negro, the New Art, the New Theatre. It will continue to shard out of Modernism, the people whose sufferings were not represented individually will create their own. The genres and categories of music and art and language will digress, will break apart, so there is no defining role as we know it. Latin, Hip-Hip, Progressive Rock, Celtic, Folk, Trance, Punk- each defines a group of people, a type of influence, a culture, a lifestyle. My music should be all of them combined, because my influences do not simply exceed one genre, they transcend numerous genres. America is a melting pot, so why is our music and our art so defined as 'black art' as 'latin music' as 'female writing.' Shouldn't this be the stopping point of this construct of race, this single chromosome that effects pigment of skin depending on how much vitamin B your skin needs to let in? It does not fucking matter. Shouldn't this be the stopping point of inequalities in gender, something that defines us as a physical being, but not as a mind and a will and a soul, and isn't that what matters. Shouldn't this be the point in which men take responsibility for their children, in which families come together, in which experiences collide- yet we avoid the things and the people that look physiologically different than us.
We all suffer. We're all animals waiting for the slaughter. We all have our own melding of culture, of experience, of life, and we need to come together, yet still be separate. This is Post-modernism. We need to come together against this government and this society in which race and gender and culture and genre are still segregated. We need to meld together, we need to procreate together, we need to experience together, so that our children can grow up in a place in which they find identify rather than self hatred, in which they can find unique culture and unique stories in every branch of their family tree, in which they can breath art and music physically as well as spiritually- because that is what defines us as humans, what makes us different than drowning dogs. We create music, we create art, we create beauty in the pages of our suffering, we create beauty in uniqueness, we meld together colors on a page and it makes some else we've never met in the world cry. We have the resources, but do we have the techniques required for Post-Modernism, are we ready for this digital world in which we've so humbly created? Do we have the courage to step outside? Do we have the power, or is it still in the hands of white aristocrats?
On Identifying Yourself as a Post-Modern Artist:
The moment you awaken from the bubble of adolescence, like a baby dropped from third story window, you understand finally what it means to have an identity crisis. Anyone that did something in high-school was the best at what they did, outside they find themselves insignificant, arrogant, and questioning the childhood ideals that are irreversibly attached to the concept of themselves. For some of us christian suburban kids, our questioning might have gone something like- who is God? Does he even exist? Did people treat me fairly for who I am? Who the hell am I without my parents? Where is truth? How can a find truth?
If you are an aspiring artist, that is anyone who relies on their creativity to squeak by in life, then you begin to wonder how to identify yourself as an artist, as well as a person influenced by diverging cultures. What are your skills as an artist? Organization of thoughts? Characterization in fiction? Then, what are your goals? This really is one of the most important questions you will ever ask, not in which form do you better express yourself. Because in Post-modernism, form will become irrelevant, simply because of technology. The internet allows for combining of mediums, digital film is the combination of mediums- the ability for everyone to do something if they so choose. One artist can write a novella, make a visual spectacle of art, play music- perform both audio and visual at the same time, art can be one thing.
I am currently in this stage, of defining my goals as an artist. Also, I have been recently trying to find my role in history- as part of a chain of movements. Studying this history however is not the end result, learning these influences is merely the first step in breaking the limitations of the art form itself and the boundaries these influences place on us. The decision of whether you want to focus on writing, film, or music seems irrelevant when you look at the bigger framework of ideas and goals you have for your expression. I have chosen to study film, music, and creative writing, as well as creating art visually as in photography and painting. There has always been a decision for me, but I see so much potential in all forms of art. Why not combine them? Why not bring back the circus, a digital circus? Why not bring back the experience of Bohemia and art like in the turn of the last century? Why not use the movement of the 1960's as momentum rather than as a memory? Why not, why not, because you have to meet someone at Starbucks in half an hour? Because you can't see the need or the suffering? That's just because we're good at hiding. I know you can see it. I know you can see it in the eyes of middle-class America watching Dr. Phil for hours, picking their split ends, filing into doctor's rooms to refill a prescription that they don't even need.
I know you can see it.
I know you can see it.
So why not do something in the only way we know how, why not start a movement, why not create art with a purpose other than masturbation, why not, what the hell are we waiting for, why is it 2008 and Post-modern art is yet to rear it's ugly head at the masses, why not use this technology to make and spread art when it has advanced pornography to it's limits already? We all know the difference between jacking off to a tape of pornography and making pure love in a pounding rhythm of verse and drum. The world doesn't know the difference. The world doesn't see the difference, because no one has given it to them in the way they can understand. So why not us? Why not now?
- Mood:
Crazy - Listening to: The Bedlam Goliath
- Reading: My American Kudiman
- Playing: Folk Music